Someone has to say it ..... Don't call me shirley
Thank You, Chris Hoelscher| Lead Database Administrator | IBM Global Technical Services| T 502.476.2538 or 502.407.7266 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 11:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Two related alias entry address questions Shirley there is a better way to introduce new behavior in a compatible manner, e.g., with a new PARM option. Having two keywords that look like they should be synonyms but aren't is user hostile. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3&data=02%7C01%7Cchoelscher%40humana.com%7C3a222bee38ca4ff5808708d7bff2a17c%7C56c62bbe85984b859e511ca753fa50f2%7C1%7C0%7C637188921126926194&sdata=Sux4fbKw0cjKasNBrwwUruxBO8Wofx1loTk4U%2FtT%2FHc%3D&reserved=0 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 9:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Two related alias entry address questions On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:23:19 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: > ... >Makes my head spin. What was IBM thinking? It is beyond me why one would want >to use one versus the other. I can envision a test case where they behave >differently, but what is the situation where you would actively want to use >one rather than the other? When would you want to use a command that was not >COPY but in your particular situation behaved just like COPY? > Might be history. IBM is loath to change an earlier behavior, no matter how adverse, lest some programmer, somewhere, has come to depend on it. On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:35:41 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >Got it! Not sure exactly what the key ingredient was but I suspect that the >problem was that I had @Gil's un-externally-named entry point: > >BAR DS 0D >... > END BAR > >I changed that to >BAR DS 0D > ENTRY BAR > END > If either IEBCOPY or INCLUDE -ATTR fails to propagate an entry address, even so bizarrely generated, IBM should take an APAR. Of course, for compatibility they'd feel compelled to invent a new option and preserve the old default. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
