Thank you. I believe you may have hit on our issue. We're getting the in use for the LOGR which is not new and I am okay with that. I'm confident we're picking up the DR COUPLExx but we've never had the POLICY statement. We were planning on issuing the SETXCF START with the new policy name. The last test we had an authorization issue on the SETXCF from the alternate console which we were using for DR. I tried to enter it from the HMC console but strangely, it would not take the whole command, cut it off at some point. Maybe because we weren't far enough along in the IPL but I was able to vary it as a console. I like the idea of using POLICY instead of SETXCF. At least no authorization issues:)
Another test this weekend... I'll keep you posted! Elaine ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
