It sounds like your COUPLExx still points to your prod XCF and CFRM datasets.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:40 PM Elaine Beal <elaine.b...@gxs.com> wrote: > To expand on this... > yes, we are just getting to the DR test:) > > I have new XCF and CFRM datasets pointing to new plant id and serial > number, policy > but no new LOGR and WLM, using same as prod (on another machine) > > defined a new policy in DR CFRM > > We IPLd at the other site for DR and got the following- > > IXC248E COUPLE DATA SET dsname ON VOLSER volser FOR typename MAY BE IN > USE BY ANOTHER SYSPLEX. > > IXC247D REPLY U to ACCEPT USE OR D TO DENY USE OF THE COUPLE DATA SET > FOR typename. > > to which both are replied to with U > > ISG379E GRS UNABLE TO CONNECT TO THE ISGLOCK STRUCTURE. VALIDATE THAT > THERE IS A COUPLING FACILITY DEFINED IN THE CFRM POLICY AND THAT IT IS > PHYSICALLY CONNECTED TO THE SYSTEM. ENSURE THAT THE CF IS IN THE PREFLIST > FOR THE ISGLOCK STRUCTURE. > > CF facility is same as prod and is defined in DR CFRM > CF is in PREFLIST > > one unusual thing is on my report for the DR CFRM > it shows both the prod policy and the new DR policy but not sure why since > I formatted a new CFRM > > The backup CTCs are in parmlib but could possibly not be connected. should > I remove those? > > Thanks, > Elaine > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Michael Babcock OneMain Financial z/OS Systems Programmer, Lead ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
