Is this worthy of an RFC or am I missing something? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3 .ieaa400/iea3a4_STORAGE_OBTAIN.htm says
,SP=subpool number Specifies the subpool number for the storage. (See z/OS MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Guide for a list of valid subpools.) If you specify a register, the subpool number must be in bits 24-31 of the register ... And ,KEY=key-number Indicates the storage key of the storage to be obtained. The valid storage keys are 0 - 15. If you pass the storage key in a register, it must be in bits 56-59 in that register. ... Isn't that bit numbering inconsistent? If the key is described as being in bits 56-59, then the subpool should be described as being in bits 60-63, right? Or am I confused? Charles ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
