On Sun, 19 May 2019 07:59:25 -0400 Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
:>Whether or not you are in an environment that would allow you to issue :>I/O, you should also consider whether it is appropriate to do so. :>Doing I/O from a system exit can cause system performance problems. It is :>the responsibility of system exits to be "well behaved".' Granted. :>It is wrong to assume that lack of documentation means "it is OK". Quite :>the reverse. Lack of documentation means that you should not assume "it is :>OK" -- but you could/should ask that the documentation be clarified to be :>explicit. I wonder what kind of check box system you think should be provided to describe what is allowed Given task, unlocked, primary, no-XMEM - isn't anything permitted in that environment allowed? Not advisable, but allowed. -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
