On 16/03/2018 5:16 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
The purpose of RDZ was to save expensive TSO cycles and overhead.
That's interesting! RDz spawns a UNIX process for each connection and
the server is written in Java which makes extensive JNI calls. I would
suggest that RDz is significantly more expensive WRT CPU cycles than ISPF.
It look like that the problem the op looks for is end user experience.
As per rdz, most clients are not aware that every dataset/table they view is
saved in their workspace directory. Btw was even more danger as it allows the
end user to connect to any ip and gain other user authority.
ITschak
נשלח מה-iPad שלי
ב-16 במרץ 2018, בשעה 10:13, Peter Hunkeler <[email protected]> כתב/ה:
.... (or is it "Rational Developer"? - what about the irrational
developers, what do they use? :-})
It is now more for the latter: IBM has rebranded RDz to IDz
--
Peter Hunkeler
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
