On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 22:32:22 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:

>Just to clarify a few points here. The old DASD we're moving off 
>of is not crusty ancient tired iron: it's DS8800 (2424). The new 
>DASD is DS8886 (2834). The motivation for moving is primarily 
>business (fiscal), not technical.

Are you using Exended Address Volumes? EAV volumes can hold a 
terabyte of data, and most data sets can go in the cylinder-managed 
space on an EAV.

>We have millions of customers who are being convertedoto 
>paperless billing, so more and more of them access the system 
>more and more often at all hours of every day. There is virtually 
>no time when all data bases happen to be closed. Closing them 
>is not impossible, but it constitutes a 'total outage' to Customer 
>Service.

I think that FDRPAS and FDRMOVE can handle the migration without 
downtime, while consolidating to fewer, larger volumes. And I think 
that there are other tools that can also be used. I don't know how 
well these tools work in a parallel Sysplex environment.

-- 
Tom Marchant

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to