Hum, I've not tried using SMFLIM yet, now you have me wanting to play around myself, maybe the 2G limit in SMFPRM is a gotya :) sorry I can't be more help, take care Anne
Carmen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Adams (DTI)" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:12:37 AM Subject: Re: SMFLIMxx parameter Hey Carmen! Yep, and things still don't work. However, if I change REGIONABOVE to 2G (or whatever I have in SMFPRMxx) then It works just fine ... except for the fact that the region size is only 2G ... and I want it all. Anne R. Adams, CISSP DTI, Systems Engineering Sr. Mainframe Services Analyst 302.298.3196 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMFLIMxx parameter Hi Anne, tell Everyone I said YO! all the example I've seen show REGION JOBNAME(*) SUBSYS(JES*,STC) REGIONABOVE(NOLIMIT) REGIONBELOW(NOLIMIT) SYSRESVABOVE(50M) SYSRESVBELOW(512K) looks like the error is pointing to the SYSRESVBELOW posssibly did you try reversing the order and try again? Carmen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Adams (DTI)" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:47:04 AM Subject: Re: SMFLIMxx parameter Hey Steve - Here's how we set up SMFLIMxx REGION JOBNAME(*) SUBSYS(STC,JES2) REGIONABOVE(NOLIMIT) REGIONBELOW(NOLIMIT) SYSRESVBELOW(512K) SYSRESVABOVE(100M) MEMLIMIT(10P) If we left SMFPRMxx MEMLIMIT(2G) then the maximum region size remained, 2G. Likewise if we put 4G or 6G that was the maximum. However if we put NOLIMIT, then it appeared to default to 2G. We tried setting REGIONABOVE(4G) in SMFLIMxx and would get and error. T SMFLIM=00 IEE252I MEMBER SMFLIM00 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB ASA008I ERROR IN PARMLIB MEMBER=SMFLIM00 ON LINE 3, POSITION 14: 362 VALUE IS NOT VALID - OUT OF RANGE. What I want to have happen is when we put NOLIMIT, the default is however much memory I have installed. Maybe I don't fully understand how this works. Anne R. Adams, CISSP DTI, Systems Engineering Sr. Mainframe Services Analyst 302.298.3196 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 9:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMFLIMxx parameter Do you have the IEF043I joblog message and the SMFLIMxx rules that you could post? Along with whatever messages you get for the refusal to run... - Steve On 8/17/2017 1:03 PM, Adams, Anne , DTI wrote: > Hello Friends, > > Has anyone had any success using (or diagnosing failures) when using the > SMFLIMxx parameter? We have a few CICS and database regions and one > unrepentant job that refuse to run. > > Anne R. Adams, CISSP > DTI, Systems Engineering > Sr. Mainframe Services Analyst > 302.298.3196 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
