Hi John,

Yep, your explanation was clear.  Simple work-around, and the simple ones are 
the best.  We do something similar here.  We have a small subset of our DASD 
sharable across both LPARs and if we need to share data between them, make a 
copy of the original data on the shared volumes, then either grab it on the 
other one or just use it from the shared location.

By the way, if you "really" want to allow your backups to get copied to disk, 
you can override the 256K block size on your initial dump tape.  I tried it 
just now and it does work with a 27998 block size on the initial dump, to then 
copy the dump tape to disk.  However, I wouldn't recommend it for several 
reasons.  First, in my little, incomplete test, setting the block size to 27998 
resulted in almost double the I/Os of leaving it at 256K.  Second, CPU time and 
elapsed time increased.  Third, tape utilization decreases due to inter block 
gaps.  Fourth, the solution you came up with is a much more efficient one 
regarding the restore of the dataset, i.e. you only needed to restore one 
dataset as opposed to restoring the entire tape volume then extracting one 
dataset from the copied tape. 

Have a great day!

Rex

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of John Dawes
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 6:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

Rex,

Thanks for the help.  I checked.  The system default for DFDSS is set at 256K.  
The reason why I cannot restore the datasets is because the volumes are SMS 
managed LPAR(A) and the backup is done from another LPAR(B).  The SMS 
configurations are not the same on LPAR A & B.  However the disks are visible 
from both the LPARs.  Why is the backup not taken on LPAR(A) pray tell?  This 
is because of CPU constraints.
   
A work around I devised is that I restored the dataset to a new name on LPAR(B) 
 then I did a copy of the dataset to the original name from LPAR(A).  

Oh! What a tangled web we weave ......

I hope that I was able to explain myself clearly.

G'day.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to