Both the ISV do have some similar products. In what way it is going to be an win-win situation
On Jun 23, 2017 4:03 AM, "Clark Morris" <[email protected]> wrote: > [Default] On 22 Jun 2017 09:05:37 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main > [email protected] (Tom Conley) wrote: > > >On 6/22/2017 11:30 AM, Phil Smith wrote: > >> John McKown wrote: > >>> https://www.channele2e.com/news/bmc-acquiring-ca-inc-going-private/ > >> > >> If this goes through, I think we'll have to admit that antitrust is > dead. Remember that DOJ examined the CA-Sterling deal way back in 2000 for > antitrust, but let it go through. 17 years later, there are many fewer > players... > >> -- > >> > > > >With the current administration and DOJ, you-know-what through a goose, > >which is bad for all of us. > > Given the total size of the market I would say it is almost > inevitable. The number of mainframe shops probably is continuing to > decline. Millions of lines of COBOL code have been turfed in favor of > SAP and its competitors. In recent decades, IBM has not been that > interested in the small mainframe shop even though these can grow into > being big mainframe shops. The market for ISVs is shrinking. > > Clark Morris > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
