On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:14:10 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Can IBM repair this even after the fact? I know SMPHOLD may contain >++HOLD ... ACTION. But I doubt that LIST ERRSYSMODS will show it,
Do you mean LIST HOLDERROR? or perhaps REPORT ERRSYSMODS? Either way, it will not. Doc and Action holds are System holds, not Error Holds. You could use LIST HOLDSYSTEM. >so it does little to alert the programmer who relies on ERRSYSMODS >after APPLY and before deployment. Relying on ERROR holds to know about SYSTEM holds would be a foolish thing to do. Especially if you mean an ERRSYSMODS Report. That only reports on unresolved error holds. > >I could envision a ++HOLD ... ERROR resolved by a trivial PTF with >the corrected ++HOLD ... ACTION. Ugh. Sure, the PTF with an incorrect SYSTEM hold could have an ERROR hold and a resolving PTF with an updated SYSTEM hold. That could be an appropriate thing to do. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
