Thanks


> On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:55 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Just having some fun with your nostalgic terminology. 
> Isn't the Large Block Interface documented?
> Why all the concern with the amount of data read at once? Why not just let 
> QSAM do its thing and then if you have performance issues, look for the best 
> way to address the actual issues? 
> 
> CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity.
> -------- Original message --------From: Reichman Joseph 
> <[email protected]> Date: 2/15/17  7:40 AM  (GMT-08:00) To: 
> [email protected] Subject: Re: QSAM using DCBE macro 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: QSAM using DCBE macro
> 
> At its core, yes.
> 
> CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity.
> -------- Original message --------From: Steve Smith <[email protected]> Date: 
> 2/15/17  7:26 AM  (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: QSAM 
> using DCBE macro Is this supposed to be a poem?
> 
> sas
> 
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Previously I had asked if there were any advantages to using BSAM over 
>> QSAM
>> 
>> I was told there were very little
>> 
>> And with a high price of coding complexity
>> 
>> Now I wonder about using the DCBE macro
>> 
>> With QSAM if there are any advantages I.E.
>> 
>> Using the large block interface
>> 
>> Would this mean that one QSAM "GET"
>> 
>> Would read more data at one time into core
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> sas
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to