Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: QSAM using DCBE macro At its core, yes. CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity. -------- Original message --------From: Steve Smith <[email protected]> Date: 2/15/17 7:26 AM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: QSAM using DCBE macro Is this supposed to be a poem? sas On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Previously I had asked if there were any advantages to using BSAM over > QSAM > > I was told there were very little > > And with a high price of coding complexity > > Now I wonder about using the DCBE macro > > With QSAM if there are any advantages I.E. > > Using the large block interface > > Would this mean that one QSAM "GET" > > Would read more data at one time into core > > Thanks > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
