Thanks for the info Tony. I wasn't aware of that and one of our products will benefit from that.
> On 12 Mar 2016, at 2:00 AM, Tony Harminc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11 March 2016 at 06:29, Robin Atwood <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, I mean GSK. Is it supported for assembler code? We have a server >> written almost entirely in assembler which uses the BPX1xxx Unix functions >> for TCP/IP. I didn't see any SSL support, though, and I am guessing you >> cannot directly call the C gsk routines. The server *is* LE enabled, if >> that helps. > > > If you have existing assembler code using the BPX1 Assembler Callable > Services for TCP sockets, then you may do better to use AT-TLS to implement > TLS in your app. You can just leave the application alone and manage > everything externally, or you can use extensions to the familiar BPX1IOC > w_ioctl() function that allow you to control AT-TLS more explictly. It's > not perfect, but it's not bad. However debugging is a pain because messages > and trace output don't come out anywhere near where your program is running. > > It's not documented in the Assembler Callable Services book, nor even in > the IP Sockets Programming book, but rather in the IP Programmer's Guide > and Reference. > > Tony H. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
