On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:14:51 -0600, Adnan Can wrote: >For the security reason,
"Security reason" does not specify what the reason is. What is the security concern? >groups other than MVS should see only the subset of the real time RMF reports. For example network group should only see the channel utilization or CPU utilization of their tasks. In other words, you want the network group to see a subset of RMF data that is worthless. "Channel utilization or CPU utilization of their tasks? That is meaningful only of the network group has their own dedicated CPUs and channels, which would be absurd for z/OS. >Other hardware and config info on the raports are irrelevant to >them. Really? You never know what is relevant until the cause of a problem is discovered. It sounds to me as if you really don't want anyone to see RMF data at all, and that the "requirement" to "secure" it is a smokescreen to avoid transparency. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
