On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:40:38 -0600, Ed Gould wrote: > >Since COBOL does not and will not in the foreseeable future need >amode 64 I find the argument un helpful. > I think the argument was intended to be taken as a frinstance.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
