8th email on the thread describes why and the "problem" to solve....
Lucas On Nov 17, 2015 18:28, "Paul Gilmartin" < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:17:41 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: > > >Latest GDG is (-000) . They were wanting the OLDEST GDG with an > >uncertain number of entries. > > > And no one has asked why. Nor what problem the OP needs to solve. > > Binary search starting with an a priori known maximal relative generation? > > But how many specific catalog searches break even with a single generic > search? > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
