On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:17:41 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: >Latest GDG is (-000) . They were wanting the OLDEST GDG with an >uncertain number of entries. > And no one has asked why. Nor what problem the OP needs to solve.
Binary search starting with an a priori known maximal relative generation? But how many specific catalog searches break even with a single generic search? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
