At 14:12 +0000 on 10/27/2015, Blake, Daniel J [CTR] wrote about Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?:

One site was very concerned about overlapping timestamps in IDMS impacting forward recovery, even though I never saw a need for an actual forward recovery situation at that site and CA well documented a work-around.

If true then the IDMS application is broken. There is IMO no valid reason why the audit records are using local time not UTC. So long as it uses UTC the only exposure is if the CPU clock is mis-set to local time not UTC.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to