(What's the antonym for atavistic) data centers should not need to IPL for autumn fallback. This means reasonably current hardware with some kind of exo-OS clock (sysplex timer or STP) with current OS and middle-ware: CICS, DB2, automation product, job scheduler, etc. Or it could be personal discomfort with duplicate local time stamps.
It might be worth a question to the data center manager as to why IPL is necessary. We are not planning on any overt action. . . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion? On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:28:14 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > >Can anyone enlighten me? Why might our datacenter need or want to IPL >for the Daylight to Standard time conversion? > Atavistic applications. I doubt there's any such residue in the OS. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
