On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:31:54 -0500, John McKown wrote: > >The physical indentation, in and of itself, wasn't really the problem in >the original code. It was my attempt to "match" the level number values >with a, to me, implied "nesting level" that causes my confusion. IMO, the >original code is, at least, confusingly coded. I've always seen, and so >expect, a given COBOL level number to match a particular "nesting" level, >as I think of it (for group moves). Perhaps this was the original >programmer's take on an "obfuscated COBOL" program. > Are you saying you now disagree with the behavior of GNU?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
