On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:17:15 +0100, Vince Coen wrote: > >Go to files -> gnu-cobol -> 2.0 and grab the latest nightly file > I'm puzzled. If GNU COBOL and IBM COBOL disagree about the syntactic validity of a construct, shouldn't this be resolved by referring to the specification of the language rather than by quibbling about whether the GNU COBOL is up to date?
If the specification is ambiguous, an RCF or something equivalent should be in order. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
