How different was the I/O configuration? Adding devices can reduce private. 
Different devices can take different storage amounts for UCB and drivers.

Different hardware can have different recovery modules loaded, changing private 
size. 

We recently dynamically added DASD. O problem, even over an IPL. Updated 
IOCP/IOCDS to make them permanent, power-on reset, and IPL. Lost 1 meg from 
private and had to adjust CSA/SQA.

Dennis Roach, CISSP, PMP
IT Security Administration Senior Analyst 
2727 Allen Parkway, Wortham Building 3rd Floor, Houston, TX 77019
Work:  713-831-8799
Cell:  713-591-1059
Email:  [email protected] 
Report information security incidents to: [email protected] and 
(818) 673-4030 

All opinions expressed by me are mine and may not agree with my employer or any 
person, company, or thing, living or dead, on or near this or any other planet, 
moon, asteroid, or other spatial object, natural or manufactured, since the 
beginning of time.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of phil yogendran
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Smaller Private Area in DR

Thanks all for the responses. I'm referring to private below the line.
Unfortunately, there's no dump or map of storage to do any meaningful 
debugging. The obvious reason is that something was added somewhere for private 
to drop 1M. I'm aware it changes in 1M chunks. However, 'nothing changed' is 
what I'm told.

Mark, can you elaborate please? Would that be in the IODF that was picked up in 
DR?

Thanks

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Ed Finnell < 
[email protected]> wrote:

> Have to examine all the parts. CSA, ECSA, etc that take away from  private.
> Something like Mark's IPLINFO is a starter or the PRIVAT mapper in IVP 
> lib is another choice.
>
>
> In a message dated 8/27/2015 1:47:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
> [email protected] writes:
>
> Might be  related to the number of devices defined to the environment.
> Are you  talking about above or below  private?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to