Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:

>>is it practical to protect DFSORT keywords or not.
>Sure it's practical, but does it serve any purpose?

As usual, you ask good questions. Perhaps not practical/economically or with 
any purposes. (Same goes with protecting languages keywords and routines as 
stated by others who contributed in this [now boring] thread.)

But your question is my auditors dog, not mine.

Anyways, I think I have *sorted* my auditors out. They accepted that protecting 
source data should be enough.

Thanks Shmuel!

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to