Isn't this a matter of semantics? No load module may be copied to a PDSE ... but ... a load module may be converted to a program object by the binder and placed in a PDSE. The end result from a user's point of view is very much like the load module having been copied to the PDSE.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 7:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IGW01595E message during PDS to PDSE copy I thought you had to use binder to create a program object from a load module. On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:36:07 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >> on 02/13/2015 at 02:47 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: >> >>>IOW, it's never possible to copy a load module to a PDSE? >> >>Not even close. You just need to use the correct utility functions to >>do the copy. >> > The man page cited earlier in the thread says: > > o All load modules contain user TTRs > > o No load module containing a user TTR can be copied to a PDSE > > My conclusion, by Aristotelian logic, no load module can be > copied to a PDSE. > > You're free to disagree with the premise(s) and submit an RCF. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
