On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:31:44 -0600, Joel Ewing wrote: >On 01/15/2015 03:29 PM, Ed Gould wrote: >> On Jan 15, 2015, at 2:36 PM, Joel Ewing wrote: >>> --------------------------SNIP------------------------------- >>> If a PDSE library could have been multi-volume, that might have been one >>> path to eliminate our requirement for PACK. >>> >>> -- >> Joel: >> I could SWEAR that in one of the announcements in the last year (or so) >> that PDSE's would support multivolume. Or am I just incorrect. >> Wouldn't EAV be an alternative solution? Or is there another restriction? (54 GB is *so* 20th Century.)
>z/OS 2.1 "DFSMS Using Data Sets" (2014) still lists single-volume >restriction for PDSE. But APAR "OA45917 NON-AMS PDSE CAN BE ALLOCATED >AS MULTIVOLUME" reports that an unusable "not valid" PDSE can actually >be allocated as multivolume via JCL in z/OS 2.1, closed FIN 2014-09-04. > Perhaps the fix will be to make it valid? In any event too late for me >-- been retired 3 1/2 years. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
