>>VLF writes SMF 41 records, but they are unusable for LLA. >That is not correct. It is true that LLA does know what it put into the cache >(as would most VLF exploiters), but (as with all VLF exploiters) it has no >idea what VLF has taken out due to trimming.
I tend to agree with the OP. LLA will only check VLF for modules it previously cached. Granted there may be some trimming, but I don't ever recall seeing less than a 100% hit ratio for LLA. The other VLF exploiters behave differently and the SMF statistics for them tend to be helpful. The CSVLLIX1 exit is required for accurate LLA fetch statistics. Bob Shannon Rocket Software ================================ Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ +1 800.966.3270 ■ +1 781.577.4321 Unsubscribe From Commercial Email – [email protected] Manage Your Subscription Preferences - http://info.rocketsoftware.com/GlobalSubscriptionManagementEmailFooter_SubscriptionCenter.html Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy ================================ This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
