On 2014-09-08, at 08:47, John McKown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Werner Kuehnel wrote: >> Amen. That's also my opinion. >> >> BTW, your REXX worked perfectly. Thanks. > > Glad it worked for you. It is not 100% reliable. One other poster in > this thread showed a possibility of data which would cause it to > malfunction. > Hardly a deficiency in the Rexx; rather a potential true ambiguity in the data, likely to appear only in a large data set. Even this might be resolved, but only by heuristic methods.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
