This is going back about 10 years since I did IMS work, but I seem to remember that you need to get rid of the leading zeros on the NAME values.
Mike On 12 April 2014 03:08, Gerhard Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > From the Planning Workload Manager book: > > Under Transaction Class: > > IMS > The CLASS keyword on the PGMTYPE=parameter in the APPLCNT macro. For > more information, see IMS/ESA System Definition Reference. > > Adam > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Ruegsegger, Jeff > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 4:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: IMS Transaction Classes in WLM > > We were advised to move away from TN classification of individual TN's and > go to Transaction Class. I defined 3 new Transaction Class Groups and > within I specified Transacion Class. > Group name . . . . . . . . . : TRANHI > Description . . . . . . . . . High priority trans - IMSHI > Fold qualifier names? . . . . Y (Y or N) > > Qualifier Name Description > 002 Class 2 > 008 Class 8 > 012 Class 12 > > In the SPM for IMS I specified TCG TRANI and assigned a Service Class > named IMSHI. After implementation all IMS transaction's were going to > Service Class IMSDEF (and yes that's the default). An IBM'er suggested not > using the TCG and use TC right in the SPM which I did > Subsystem Type . : IMS Fold qualifier names? Y (Y or N) > Description . . . IMS Workloads > > Action codes: A=After C=Copy M=Move I=Insert rule > B=Before D=Delete row R=Repeat IS=Insert Sub-rule > More ===> > --------Qualifier-------- -------Class-------- > Action Type Name Start Service Report > DEFAULTS: IMSDEF RPRODONL > ____ 1 TC 002 ___ IMSHI ________ > ____ 1 TC 008 ___ IMSHI ________ > ____ 1 TC 012 ___ IMSHI ________ > ____ 1 TCG TRANMED ___ IMSDEF RPRODMED > > > All my IMS transactions are still going to IMSDEF. RMF WLM report only > shows data for IMSDEF and IMSHI is "ALL DATA ZERO" > > My question is, are the TC Names I"m using correct? That is to say, is the > "002" im specifying int WLM going to match the IMS Transaction Class as > defined in IMS TRANSACT macro? (3rd parameter of the MSGTYPE= keyword) > TRANSACT CODE=MYTRAN, X > EDIT=(UC), X > FPATH=NO, X > INQUIRY=(NO,RECOVER), X > MODE=SNGL, X > MSGTYPE=(MULTSEG,RESPONSE,2), X > PARLIM=0, X > PROCLIM=(10,30), X > PRTY=(7,10,2), X > SCHD=1, X > SEGNO=0, X > SEGSIZE=0 > > I have found zero information on this in IBM publications nor anywhere > else. > Thanks in advance if you have some experience with this! > Regards, > Jeff > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
