We were advised to move away from TN classification of individual TN's and go
to Transaction Class. I defined 3 new Transaction Class Groups and within I
specified Transacion Class.
Group name . . . . . . . . . : TRANHI
Description . . . . . . . . . High priority trans - IMSHI
Fold qualifier names? . . . . Y (Y or N)
Qualifier Name Description
002 Class 2
008 Class 8
012 Class 12
In the SPM for IMS I specified TCG TRANI and assigned a Service Class named
IMSHI. After implementation all IMS transaction's were going to Service Class
IMSDEF (and yes that's the default). An IBM'er suggested not using the TCG and
use TC right in the SPM which I did
Subsystem Type . : IMS Fold qualifier names? Y (Y or N)
Description . . . IMS Workloads
Action codes: A=After C=Copy M=Move I=Insert rule
B=Before D=Delete row R=Repeat IS=Insert Sub-rule
More ===>
--------Qualifier-------- -------Class--------
Action Type Name Start Service Report
DEFAULTS: IMSDEF RPRODONL
____ 1 TC 002 ___ IMSHI ________
____ 1 TC 008 ___ IMSHI ________
____ 1 TC 012 ___ IMSHI ________
____ 1 TCG TRANMED ___ IMSDEF RPRODMED
All my IMS transactions are still going to IMSDEF. RMF WLM report only shows
data for IMSDEF and IMSHI is "ALL DATA ZERO"
My question is, are the TC Names I"m using correct? That is to say, is the
"002" im specifying int WLM going to match the IMS Transaction Class as defined
in IMS TRANSACT macro? (3rd parameter of the MSGTYPE= keyword)
TRANSACT CODE=MYTRAN, X
EDIT=(UC), X
FPATH=NO, X
INQUIRY=(NO,RECOVER), X
MODE=SNGL, X
MSGTYPE=(MULTSEG,RESPONSE,2), X
PARLIM=0, X
PROCLIM=(10,30), X
PRTY=(7,10,2), X
SCHD=1, X
SEGNO=0, X
SEGSIZE=0
I have found zero information on this in IBM publications nor anywhere else.
Thanks in advance if you have some experience with this!
Regards,
Jeff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
