On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:19:43 -0500, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote:
>There is certainly no objection to using L'<whatever> in order to >ensure that the length in bytes of <whatever> is declared and must be >changed in only one place; but this usage 1) is available only at >assembly time and 2) is not a substitute for the explicit >specification of this length somewhere. > As it stands, increasing the size of the bit map beyond 10,00 bits requires re-assembly anyway. It would be instructive to see how the field ITMLNG is initialized. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
