On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:24:44 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: >Clarke Morris wrote: > ><begin extract> >The problem is not the compiler options used for the COBOL generation >of CSP programs, the problem is the compiler options of the programs >that use the output from CSP programs. ></end extract> > >and I disagree. The problem here is one of incoherence. All of the >COBOL programs that access the same data need to be compiled with the >same value of <option> in NUMPROC(<option>). Moreover, it is now >clear that NUMPROC(NOPFD) is what is required globally. > >More generally, the traditional COBOL-shop aversion to recompiling is >one that urgently needs to be discarded. It was never sensible, and >it is no longer even tenable. > What, then, of archival data generated with NUMPROC(YESPFD)? Is there even a conversion utility available?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
