On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:01:05 -0800, retired mainframer wrote: >:>: > >:>: I find no ++LMOD MCS mentioned in the TOC of: >:>: >:>: Title: SMP/E V3R6.0 for z/OS V1R13.0 Reference >:>: Document Number: SA22-7772-16 > >Yes, my bad. It is not the non-existent ++LMOD MCS but the description of >the LMOD data set entry in chapter 5. >... >Since JCLIN supports multiple job steps (chapter 9 of this reference), there >is no problem having two LKED steps with different SYSLMOD DD statements >and/or with different NAME/ALIAS control cards. > The problem is that the utility commands issued by SMP/E are not homeomorphic to the the job steps appearing in the JCLIN. There is a single LMOD entry in the target zone for a given named load module. All LKED steps appearing in the JCLIN update that single LMOD entry. Subsequently, guided by that LMOD entry, SMP/E invokes the Binder to generate two identical load modules in the two SYSLIB target data sets appearing in that LMOD entry.
(I skipped over mentioning the LMOD subentries in the MOD entries. The same concerns apply.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
