The listserv bounced the first version of this as a duplicate. Do they
have a bug?
On 11/12/2013 2:20 PM, CM Poncelet wrote:
There will always be 'risks' with APF'd libraries in the wrong hands.
It's up to the security administrator to grant MVS SETPROG authority
only to trusted developers.
SETPROG seems like overkill. Many moons ago I modified a CBT
contribution from Don Higgins named LOADZAP (?). As an option it will
authorize the STEPLIB's DEB and then invoke the specified module
authorized if AC=1. This is much less of an exposure, and more easily
controlled.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, Vermont
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
