Isn't the answer link edit AC=1? He asked about a module,not a library.The subject of SYSLMOD must be APF authorised...Do we care?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, CM Poncelet <[email protected]> wrote: > The question was about how to APF-authorize a program in a single JCL > jobstream. > > The answer to that question is: > > > "//*-------------------------------------------------------------------* " > "//* APF-AUTHORISE OUR STEPLIB DATASET(S) * " > "//*-------------------------------------------------------------------* " > "//ADDAPF EXEC PGM=IEBGENER " > "//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* " > "//SYSIN DD DUMMY " > "//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(*,INTRDR) " > "//SYSUT1 DD *,DLM=@@ " > "/*$VS,'SETPROG APF,ADD,DSN=<your loadlib DSN>,SMS' " > "@@ " > "//* " > "//*-------------------------------------------------------------------* " > "//* RUN PROGRAM WHATEVER APF-AUTHORISED * " > "//*-------------------------------------------------------------------* " > "//WHATEVER EXEC PGM=WHATEVER " > "//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=<your loadlib DSN> " > "//DD1 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=<whatever #1> " > "//DD... DD DISP=SHR,DSN=<whatever #...> " > "//DDn DD DISP=SHR,DSN=<whatever #n> " > "//* " > "//*-------------------------------------------------------------------* " > "//* APF-UNAUTHORISE OUR STEPLIB DATASET(S) * " > "//*-------------------------------------------------------------------* " > "//DELAPF EXEC PGM=IEBGENER " > "//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* " > "//SYSIN DD DUMMY " > "//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(*,INTRDR) " > "//SYSUT1 DD *,DLM=@@ " > "/*$VS,'SETPROG APF,DELETE,DSN=<your loadlib DSN>,SMS' " > "@@ " > "//* " > > "In ADDAPF and DELAPF above, replace ",SMS" with ",VOLUME=<volser of your > loadlib>" if the loadlib to be APF'd is not SMS-managed. " > "If the format of the APF list is static, add the following card before > the 1st "/*$VS,'SETPROG APF,ADD,DSN=<etc.>" card in step ADDAPF: " > "/*$VS,'SETPROG APF,FORMAT=DYNAMIC' " > > Whether (or not) the user is authorized to issue MVS SETPROG commands is > not part of the question. Hence any 'discussion' that deviates from > answering the question at hand is just waffle. > > (BTW It looks like all examples of JCL need to be enclosed in quotes ... > to avoid freaking-out the 'LISTSERV' <grin>.) > > Cheers, > > Chris Poncelet > IBM Systems Programming Consultant (retired) > Logic Integration Limited > > > > > Mark Zelden wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:27:01 -0800, Jon Perryman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Dynamic APF exists for sysprog test system and emergency situations. >>> >> >> <snip> >> >> Valid, but I would argue that the *main* reason dynamic APF (and dynamic >> "anything" related to parmlib type updates) exists is "IPL avoidance" / 24 >> x 7 operations. Many >> shops still limit APF and LNKLST changes to (mostly) IPLs (including >> clients of >> mine), but that is a throw back to days of old. The only disadvantage >> of doing >> these changes dynamically all the time is that eventually you will IPL >> and without >> good change control, changes could get regressed or errors in syntax etc. >> at IPL time may be found. >> Mark >> -- >> Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto: >> [email protected] ITIL v3 Foundation Certified >> Mark's MVS Utilities: >> http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.htmlSystems Programming expert at >> http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Wayne V. Bickerdike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
