On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 08:47:45 -0600, Alan Field wrote: >Possibly because many of us don't run Session manager. > Why not? Is that separately priced? I think I tried it once; saw no advantage to it, and reverted. Does it play well with ISPF?
>Here's what I get: SESSION MANAGER NOT ACTIVE - SMCOPY IGNORED in response >to the SMCOPY command. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
