On 11/04/13 19:00, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 11/4/2013 9:23 AM, Russ Teubner wrote:
I don't think customers mind using (and paying for) high-value MIPS for high-value apps. However, everything else (e.g., integration and "plumbing") should be run on specialty engines (within the bounds of IBM's rules).

Agreed. For example, it would be good if monitors such a RMF and others did not use costly machine cycles.


The Tivoli Omegamon suite for one <jumping up and down, waving hands>

--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
----

The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe...
The loud ones only take the credit.

Londo Mollari - Babylon 5

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to