RESENT WITH BETTER (I HOPE) FORMATTING
I'm sorry for inconvenience.
W dniu 29.11.2025 o 06:08, Brian Westerman pisze:
I would hate to see IBM-MAIN be penalized because of involvement with illegal
use of th ADCD system.
IMHO there is no such risk.
It would be ridiculous to claim that IBM-MAIN is helping piracy just
because someone asked technical question and got answer from another
person.
Actually no one here provided the proof of licence with the question.
Should we demand full licencing audit report before answering?
I do not support software piracy, however I'm not going to check
someone's licences whenever I respond about RACF, FICON, ICSF, whatever.
BTW: The original question was the following:
"I would like to know if CPENABLE applies to ADCD environments. If it
does, what would be the best definition?"
I see CPENABLE and ADCD here. Nothing about improper or unlicensed use.
Did I miss something?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
