T sting region size is pointless. All our tests have been conducted in the 
shell which has a maximum regi

> On 17 Mar 2025, at 06:53, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
> 
> Both tests specified REGION=0M. Here are the stats from the two compiles:
> 
> Open:
> CPU:     0 HR  00 MIN  01.29 SEC    SRB:     0 HR  00 MIN  00.03 SEC      
> VIRT:    20K  SYS:   244K  EXT:   243432K  SYS:    25660K                 
> ATB- REAL:                 68856K  SLOTS:                     0K          
>     VIRT- ALLOC:      88M SHRD:       0M                                      
>                 
> 
> Legacy:
> CPU:     0 HR  00 MIN  00.36 SEC    SRB:     0 HR  00 MIN  00.00 SEC  
> VIRT:    80K  SYS:   252K  EXT:   108328K  SYS:    16728K             
> ATB- REAL:                   232K  SLOTS:                     0K      
>     VIRT- ALLOC:      13M SHRD:       0M                             
> 
> Charles
> 
>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 15:48:18 -0500, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Trying to hold down the noise by doing one reply for all of your great 
>> suggestions.
>> 
>> @Peter, no, did not know about .pch. The documentation is sorely lacking. 
>> Would like to give that a try but no idea how.
>>> Did you run both of those tests using the same REGION value on the same 
>>> LPAR?
>> Same exact virtual machine on both but I am not certain about the REGION 
>> size. Suspect it was the same. I will look when I get back online and 
>> possibly re-test.
>> 
>> @David Crayford, agree, this product does not seem quite yet ready for prime 
>> time. Sadly. I had hoped to move forward with the new compiler.
>> 
>> @David Cole, well, both compile and run times are important. If you pay for 
>> compile cycles, as we do, then compile CPU time is important. If you value 
>> developer time, then compile elapsed time is important. Of course run time 
>> is important, but harder to measure: what inputs, on what machine?
>> 
>> @Allen: noted. I will re-run the tests with larger and consistent region 
>> sizes. I suspect they were the same, but I am not online at the moment.
>> 
>> Also not sure what the OPT value was for the Open compiler test. I did not 
>> specify, and the default does not seem to be documented :-( OPT value was 0 
>> for the legacy test. When I retest I will specify OPT 0.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to