Please excuse me for confusing people, I confused myself too. Reading the logs 
again, here's the actual scenario.

1) Step one initiates a data transfer to another system in the sysplex. 
2) Step two allocates a dataset with the same dataset name for *reasons*.

The dynamic allocation failure that's returned in the log actually occurs on 
the remote system. There's a shared enqueue already for the target dataset so 
the attempt by the receiving system to allocate the dataset, I assume its 
requesting exclusive fails.

Mark Jacobs


Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected]


On Wednesday, February 19th, 2025 at 9:01 AM, Paul Gilmartin 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:17:48 +0000, Mark Jacobs [email protected] 
> wrote:
> 
> > One of the things I'm going to test is whether setting S99NORES in S99FLAG2 
> > might work. If so all we need to do is convince the software vendor to 
> > support setting it on a job-by-job basis.
> 
> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=fields-additional-flags-s99flag2
> 
> Note: Data sets being allocated are normally serialized via ENQ with MAJOR 
> name SYSDSN, MINOR name -data set name-. When S99NORES is set, there is NO 
> data set serialization and multiple tasks may reference or update the data 
> set simultaneously, resulting in unpredictable effects. It is the 
> responsibility of the authorized program setting S99NORES to provide the 
> necessary serialization.
> 
> Do you want to do that? It might be a hard sell with the vendor.
> 
> "Vendor"? Is that vendor using multiple address spaces?
> 
> -- gil
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to