On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:28:24 +0000, Mark Jacobs wrote: >True, but not in the test case I used to verify that the problem exists in the >simplest way I could think of. > >Step 1. A user written program that issues the wait SVC without the ECB ever >being posted. >Step 2. PGM=IEFBR14 with a dataset allocated DISP=SHR > >A D GRS command verified that the enqueue was held by this job while it was >waiting in step 1. >
Did your test Step 1 reproduce the problem by issuing a DYNALLOC which failed with an ENQ conflict? (You didn't say or show code.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
