Hi Radek,
You said: "... it is convenient and justified to have more than one
userid ..."
+1
Regards,
David
On 11/25/2024 05:53, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
My $0.02
(off-topic)
1. UADS is not needed today.
2. UADS is *bad* way to proceed when "security server fails to come
up". There are much better ways, like backup copy of RACF db and some
tech system. Once upon a time I tried to logon in failsafe mode.
Access to every dataset means WTOR. Approx 100 WTORs to get IPSF first
screen.
(on-topic)
3. In sysplex multiple logons to TSO are possible, one logon per z/OS
image.
4. The above is not black magic, however it require some simple
changes in ISPF configuration.
5. I don't know about documentation, however it is well described on
some SHARE presentations available on Internet.
6. The above is quite easy to test in some environment, in case of
mistake the backout is also easy.
7. There are some (old, I suppose) "custom" ways to do it, however I
would not recommend it. There is no reason to make live harder.
(again off-topic)
8. From security point of view it is unacceptable to have single
userid used by several persons. However it is nothing wrong in having
multiple userids per person - each userid is owned by *one* person.
And of course sometimes it is convenient and justified to have more
than one userid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
