W dniu 17.07.2024 o 06:55, Brian Westerman pisze:
I don't know if there is a way to work around it, but I changed my directions
to pre-allocate the empty volumes before I start the install process after my
first test installation back when z/OS 3.1 came out. From then one I just
automatically pre-allocate them. I remember thinking how silly that was, but I
didn't open a problem on it or anything.
Thank you for that.
I still can't believe the "enhancement" could introduce such
DIS-enhancement.
I see some UI/UX improvements, however I also see lack of documentation
and such "features" as above.
I am NOT GUI enemy. I would like to have z/OSMF as ready to use as ISPF
(ready to use and configurable). I understand GUI advantages. However
it should work and it should be well documented.
BTW: I just found an error in z/OSMF aka Software Management.
I renamed some datasets.
I made a mistake and used already existing names. SMPE.MVS100 and
SMPE.MVS114. Finally I got duplicates and cryptic error message. And
original names of the datasets were displayed WRONG. So I had to *guess*
which one of "SYS1.DUPLICATE" was MVS100 or MVS114.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
