Why?  In order to catch the ones who DON'T die and grow their business to the 
size IBM finds (more) profitable.  I'm not talking about "next gen" IT 
companies but the startups and family companies in practical, everyday 
businesses.

If they grow without IBM technology they probably won't ever even look at IBM 
for IT solutions.  Therefore lost potential clients.

But I admit that is just my somewhat parochial view.  We can agree to disagree.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 3:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OSMF

Why would IBM offer state of the art technology that they’ve spent billions to 
develop to “next generation” companies, most of whom will die within a decade? 
Wouldn’t that tick off their current customers who might then ask for a similar 
discount? Do automakers offer discounts to those who can’t afford their 
products? Do insurance companies offer discounts to consumers who can’t afford 
the premiums? IBM must also consider their shareholders who rely on the 
dividend. As we’ve discussed previously, IBM mainframes are growing customers 
and growing their transactions processed for their current customers.

As for ignoring small & medium sized companies, I disagree. They’ve got a 
number of small and midsized companies including health insurers, banks, 
retailers, etc. I’ve worked for some who still run a mainframe. 


On Tuesday, June 27, 2023, 10:49 AM, Farley, Peter 
<0000031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

The counter-argument to that is "How do you build the next generation(s) of 
companies that need/want to buy mainframes?".  By abandoning the low end (and 
frankly the middle as well) IBM is cutting off any such development of a future 
client base.

Hint: It isn't through outsourcers.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OSMF

Why would anyone think IBM wants to sell a mainframe to everyone? Any more than 
Tesla wants to sell to people who buy 15-20k autos. Someone needing 20 MSUs 
would be a perfect candidate for outsourcing to someone who outsources 
mainframe capacity.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Tuesday, June 27, 2023, 9:36 AM, Pommier, Rex <rpomm...@sfgmembers.com> 
wrote:

If a company is using a 20 MSU system and is forced to buy a 200 MSU system 
because that's the smallest available, unless something drastic happens to 
hardware AND software pricing, the company isn't going to be looking for "what 
else can I put on this expensive and woefully underutilized machine", they're 
going to be looking at "where can I move my 20 MSUs worth of processing to get 
rid of this expensive machine".  

We're running a 2-way, 316 MSU machine and my business customers would squawk 
loudly if I had to move our workload to a 4 way with no more horsepower.  We 
have several single-threaded processes that run that would be woefully impacted 
if the per-engine thruput was halved.

Rex

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Andrew Rowley
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 5:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OSMF

On 27/06/2023 5:40 pm, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> 200 MSU was much more than we needed. Maybe 20 or so at our peaks. And the 
> z/OS and ISV charges at 200 levels would have been intolerable.

That's why I keep qualifying it with ISVs would have to adjust their pricing. 
While the smallest system is 13 MSU they have no reason to do that, but if the 
smallest available system was 200 MSU I think they would be forced to adjust.

If you are using 100% of a 20 MSU system, z/OS is just an expensive system that 
can't do much more than run the stuff still around from the 90s.

If you are using 20 MSU of a 200 MSU system, it's an expensive system hugely 
underutilized, and maybe people start asking what work can be moved there, how 
to make better use of the data it contains etc?

--

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to