I don't understand your reply. If the module is not marked as serially reusable, then doesn't every LINK or LOAD get a fresh copy?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Peter Relson [rel...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 8:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Are JNI required to be re-entrant and/or re-usable? >OP stated that it is not reusable. Maybe I'm mis-using the term "reusable". I'm not referring to "serially reusable" (by which the OS manages attempts to fetch the same module again while it still known to be in use). I'm referring to simply using it once and then using it again. I'm hypothesizing that the module is not properly set up to be used and then used again. If it's not at least able to be used again, then the higher level functionality of reentrant and serially reusable don't even come into play, and talking about calling it multiple times does not make sense. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
