On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:05:20 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >I think that it would be easier to enhance the processing of CLOCKxx for DST. >There is a lot that is in CLOCKxx and not in TZ. > TZ is a POSIX requirrement: <https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html#tag_08>.
What's in CLOCKxx that's absent from TZ, which already contains the rules for DST? But the issue that spun this thread is inconsistency. A utility taking a single input and generating values for both CLOCKxx and TZ might suffice if used. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
