Chris,

Thanks for the info.  I will update my notes.

Lizette


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf
> Of Blaicher, Christopher Y.
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 7:10 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: DFSORT alternatives
> 
> Liz, et al,
> 
> IBM markets DB2Sort as an upgrade to DFSort for DB2 applications.  DB2Sort is 
> a
> modified version of Syncsort MFX designed to work in unison with the DB2 
> utilities.
> 
> So, while it is true that you can't use Syncsort MFX with DB2, you can get 
> the power,
> and z/IIP offload, of Syncsort technology in DB2Sort.
> 
> Chris Blaicher
> Principal Software Engineer, Software Development Syncsort Incorporated
> 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
> P: 201-930-8260  |  M: 512-627-3803
> E: [email protected]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf
> Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 8:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: DFSORT alternatives
> 
> Unless IBM has changed to allow Syncsort to be used, my understanding was 
> that IBM
> was only using DFSORT for DB2 functions.  So several shops where I worked 
> that had
> SYNCSORT, for DB2- IBM Shipped DFSORT for DB2.  So for batch sorts, I would 
> see
> the WER messages.  When working on DB2 utilities that invoked sort, I would 
> see ICE
> messages.
> 
> It is possible that IBM has changed that function, if so, I will update my 
> notes.
> 
> Lizette
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of R.S.
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 6:49 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: DFSORT alternatives
> >
> > W dniu 2013-04-02 15:36, Lizette Koehler pisze:
> > > If you have DB2 you will still have DFSORT.  Just a smaller version
> > > to support DB2 functions
> >
> > But this has nothing to do with the choice DB2 vs Syncsort. You can
> > have Syncsort and use it everywhere except internal use of DB2.
> >
> > > If you do not have DB2 then SYNCSORT is an alternative.
> > No. You can have DB2 and still have the choice.
> >
> >
> > BTW: There is also IBM product called "DB2 Sort" or similar. This is
> > Syncsort, available only as an OEM (under IBM logo) and only for DB2 
> > purposes.
> >
> > --
> > Radoslaw Skorupka
> > Lodz, Poland
> >
> >

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to