Back before Old Man Noach cornered the market if Gofer wood, you needed to allocate a pseude-punch or pseudo-CTCA in order to write to the internal reader. I don't recall a bottleneck once HASP became JES2 and ASP became JES3.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 11:06 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: JES2 DUPL_JOB parameter On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:29:44 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote: >Note also that it has been mentioned before in this forum in other >contexts: submitting two jobs with the same job name in sequence and >expecting "DELAY" to force them to run in the sequence submitted is only >valid if you have a single JES2 Converter//I/nterpreter running, which I >suspect is no longer true at most installations. > Does each SYSOUT(,INTRDR) get a separate C/I? I was told at one time to use INTRDR sparingly; it used a scarce resource. But, later, that such a constraint had been relaxed. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
