I wonder what the urgency is to run duplicate job names simultaneously. Jobnames are cheap enough, so why not give them different names if you want them run together.
Using the jobname to single-thread a slew of repetitive jobs is not that uncommon, and perfectly reasonable as long as you aren't depending on the order they run. In many of those scenarios, the alternative would be lots of initiators jammed up with jobs waiting on DSN enqueues. sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
