Worked right means what? Syntactically? Or performed exactly as you expected on 
input you controlled or knew what was in it? I’ve spent 40 years in ALL aspects 
of IT. I was an Ops manager once and used to get resumes from people who 
claimed to be Mainframe Computer Operators. Most didn’t know what JCL was.
I wrote many programs that worked 1st try using EASYTRIEVE, SAS, REXX, CLIST, 
DF & SYNC SORT. Decades ago wrote some Assembler (simple) that worked 1st try. 
Wrote a boatload of PL/I in college. Fortran, COBOL, at employers, far more 
complex, that rarely worked 1st try. 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Sunday, August 22, 2021, 3:40 PM, Bob Bridges <[email protected]> wrote:

Bill, I don't understand what could have pushed your buttons.  For instance:

BJ> Comparing a 40 line REXX/CLIST “program” to a 10,000 line IMS/COBOL program 
that scans a parts database is an absolute joke.

But the only one making that comparison is you.  (Maybe that's why you were the 
only one laughing :). )

Maybe this is the key:

BJ> No bee in my bonnet. Just don’t like braggarts.

A few of us (including me) posted "I once wrote a 30-line program that worked 
right the first time", and what you heard is "am I not amazing, wonderful, 
brilliant?  Do you not all admire me?"  Is that what happened?

---
Bob Bridges, [email protected], cell 336 382-7313

/* When it comes to cooking, five years ago I felt guilty "just adding water." 
Now I want to bang the tube against the countertop and have a five-course meal 
pop out. If it comes with plastic silverware and a plate that self-destructs, 
all the better.  -Erma Bombeck */

--- On 2021-08-21 21:51, Bill Johnson wrote:
> “Programming” in REXX, CLIST, and similar types of languages is hardly 
> programming. Real programming is hundreds or thousands of lines of COBOL, 
> with IMS, DB2, or CICS calls. I was pretty damn good too. Started off in 
> COBOL/IMS 4 decades ago. Did a little bit of COBOL/CICS and quite a bit of 
> COBOL/DB2 later. Try putting together the necessary code to drill down a 
> hierarchical database like IMS.
>
> --- On Saturday, August 21, 2021, 9:31 PM, Bob Bridges 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> This part of the thread got me thinking.  How often do you write a program 
> that works right the first time, with no compile or execution errors?  I'm 
> not talking about two-liners, of course, or even ten-liners; let's say 30 or 
> thereabouts.  Please specify the language, too, since it seems to me they 
> vary in error-prone-ness.
>
> I've done it occasionally, but by "occasionally" I mean "less than one time 
> in twenty"; maybe much less, I'm not sure, and only once in my life when 
> anyone was watching.  That was in PL/C; mostly nowadays I write in REXX and 
> VBA.
>
> In fact my REXXes typically start out with at least ten or fifteen lines of 
> boilerplate, and any VBA/Excel program likely relies on a raft of common 
> functions and/or objects that are part of my regular library, so when I say 
> "30 lines", some of those lines don't really count.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Tom Brennan
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 13:41
>
> ....one of my other supervisors/teachers would tell me about her application 
> experience.  She said no matter how complex her COBOL programs were, they 
> would not only compile first time but would run perfectly.  This of course 
> was due to her rigorous desk-checking which I assume took days.
>
> I remember thinking "that's crazy" but I just kept quiet.  I'll give her a 
> break because that could have been at the time of card punching where such 
> desk-checking made far more sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to